1) What would you say stood out about your presentation performance?
Honestly, since most people have heard about video game journalism, I believe the thing that stood out was the fact that reviews about video games have more of a meaning than of those compared to movies; like what I said about my presentation: "Movies cost $10 to see while video games cost about $50-$60 dollars." Also, I believe that I showed that I knew my topic as well as understood as to why I chose video game journalism as my topic.
2) What was most challenging to do in this first presentation and why?
The most challenging thing to do was to limit what I had to say into a maximum of five minutes. Aside from fighting the nervousness, I had to cut out many crucial parts, such as the introduction question, just to allow myself to believe I would make the time limit. Also, now that I think about it, it was hard to keep myself in check, at some points I believed I rushed or stalled too many times.
3) What is the difference between the literal and interpretive in your presentation?
The difference between the literal and interpretive within my interpretation is simple. The literal facts in my presentation is why journos write about these games, be it for popularity or for the community while the interpretive of my presentation was connecting the articles to the gaming cimmunity to see what games to spend their money on.
4) What will you take from this and apply to future presentations?
In future presentations, I will now carry the four main things journos take into consideration while writing an article on a game. Also, I will learn from this presentation and learn to slow down, rehearse, and try not to stall or rush through any sections.
No comments:
Post a Comment